Re: Very uneven distribution of packages per maintainer

[Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shalehperry@attbi.com>]

>
> Not necessarily -- some packages are a lot of work, like xfree, glibc,
> apache, some are a decent amount of work, like mailman, cvs and some
> are close to zero work, like chrpath and xslide.  People also have
> different amounts of time available -- those who are paid to do Debian
> maintainence at work will have more time than somebody who works 12
> hours/day without any Debian work in there, etc.
>
> So, why do you think having a more even distribution is a good thing?
> Or rather, why is the current situation so bad?
>

indeed.  Some packages are "worth" 10 "normal" packages in the amount of work 
they require.

Also, perhaps the script could deal with items like qa owning orphaned 
packages and the like.