Guido Trotter <email@example.com> writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> > directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low >> > . >> > * New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276) >> >> Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were >> requests for a new version, which they were not. >> > > The features included in that version (and listed in upstream changelog) > solve the problems reported in the other two report... Then please use a changelog entry for each change, such as * New Upstream Version (closes: #176227) - Fixes error after updating user entry (closes: #188308) - Fixes segfaults on connect (closes: #90276) If you don't do this, the original bug submitters will see a bug has been fixed, but probably not remember what the bug was, especially if he or she filed multiple bugs for the package. Furthermore, it's a real pain to have to look at the BTS, and then search through the upstream changelog to find the corresponding fix. This should be described in the developer's reference (as if anyone actually follows it). -- Poems... always a sign of pretentious inner turmoil.
Description: PGP signature