On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:47:34AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> writes: > > > Q: is content-disposition handled properly, especially for > > messag/rfc822 type attachments? (Or if not, are message attachments > > displayed inline by default?) > Gnus: yes (since 5.8.0, the first MIME-aware version) > > (Yes, I've stopped caring about users of a certain other widespread MUA, as > > you've probably guessed anyway when you notice me using PGP/MIME to sign > > messages...) > I'm not actually clear how much this is a good thing; at some level, > we do want people reporting bugs. (Though at the same level, we also > want them reading and using debian-user, and "get a real MUA" is a > common sentiment there.) I dunno, I've always found use of Outlook to be a fairly good predictor of bug-reporting cluelessness (use of reportbug being another :). Looking at the bug graphs, I have a hard time believing that lack of bug reporting is a bottleneck for Debian. ;) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpJkAwXzHmEm.pgp
Description: PGP signature