Re: libstdc++... Help please
David Starner <email@example.com> wrote:
>> sid=unstable - you know that, don't you?
> We need someone to test unstable, don't we? We can not realistically
> test our distribution if the only people running it are those with many
> computers who put it on one they aren't really using. Please don't give
> our testers crap for actually testing the system in real life
If somebody _needs_ his computer working 100% ("I've got an essay due
in 24 hours...") and runs unstable on it imho some reminder that this
might be a bad choice is *required*.
PS: And please don't forget the fact that I did provide a solution for
the original problem.