Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:08:04 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
> From: Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re:
> Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant) Date: Fri, 18 Apr
> 2003 12:24:47 -0500
>> > Note users can add local modification freely with the current
>> > method, please read README.Debian.
>> But an admin may no longer freely synchronize the conffile across
>> the whole heterogeneous installation. This assumption that all the
>> world is Debian, and introducing gratituous incompatibility with
>> the rest of the TeX world is what smacks of bad design decisions.
> I don't understand why you say "an admin may no longer freely
> synchronize the conffile"?
I used to have TeX on 27 machines, including Ultrix, OSF/1,
Aix, HP-UX, and later, True64 Unix. And we had the same printer
accesible to all these machines, and the same set of users. I
maintained the same texmf.conf, and the same metapost/LaTeX/TeX
configurations across the whole lab, using a simple home grown rsync
If Debian had some there, it would blithely have overridden a
carefully crafted set of configurations files, un a gratituous
incompatibility with how TeX installations are maintained across the
rest of the known universe.
> As I wrote in former email, other systems, like FreeBSD and/or
> RedHat, might use non-standard texmf.cnf because of lack of an
> appropriate tool but then there is no need to synchronize with them,
If the whole world uses some other mechanism, then ours is the
non standard one, not everyone elses.
"I'd love to go out with you, but I'm converting my calendar watch
from Julian to Gregorian."
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C