Re: stop abusing debconf already
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:58:14 +0200,
>> Marc Haber <email@example.com> said:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 16:47:26 -0500, Steve Langasek
>> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Um, no. *Policy* says that it may not be used as a registry.
> This has always prompted me to ask myself _why_ debconf entries are
> persistent then.
So one does not have to answer the same question over and over
on each install.
> If I _really_ have to parse config files in my config script to
> properly seed debconf to ask the right questions, then why does
> debconf have a database in the first place?
Because not all debconf responses are stored in configuration
files? Some debconf answers influence installation scripts behaviour,
and never impact the installed program behaviour.
No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C