Re: stop abusing debconf already
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:58:14 +0200,
>> Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> said:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 16:47:26 -0500, Steve Langasek
>> vorlon@netexpress.net> wrote:
>> Um, no. *Policy* says that it may not be used as a registry.
> This has always prompted me to ask myself _why_ debconf entries are
> persistent then.
So one does not have to answer the same question over and over
on each install.
> If I _really_ have to parse config files in my config script to
> properly seed debconf to ask the right questions, then why does
> debconf have a database in the first place?
Because not all debconf responses are stored in configuration
files? Some debconf answers influence installation scripts behaviour,
and never impact the installed program behaviour.
manoj
--
No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from
it. Schulz
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: