Richard A Nelson <cowboy@debian.org> writes:
> Why was this rebuilt with libdb2-dev ? Shouldn't we be trying to
> get things to db4.1 at this point ? I'd think db3 at a minimum.
Simply because the Build-Depends were on libdb2-dev, and I didn't want
to risk breaking things by changing it.
> This isn't just idle curiosity either, SASL impacts MANY packages -
> most MTAs and anything using OpenLDAP.
>
> If we don't agree on a minimum, or at least a preferred lib... we're
> going to have packages linked against 3 different levels - not fun
If we can get a concensus, I'd be happy to do another NMU. First I'd
want to be sure changing this won't cause serious problems with
existing packages, though.
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card