Re: /run and read-only /etc

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /run and read-only /etc
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: 08 Apr 2003 01:33:17 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1049779997.14767.20.camel@bohr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030408010359.GC24276@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <[🔎] 1049747753.2635.87.camel@thanatos> <[🔎] 20030408010359.GC24276@wonderland.linux.it>

On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 21:03, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> No. This is a gratuitous incompaibility from long time UNIX systems
> practice.

So is ssh (vs. telnet). That does not make it a bad idea. Same with the
FHS in general.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

References:
- Re: /run and read-only /etc
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood0@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: /run and read-only /etc
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>

Prev by Date: Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-10 (i386 source all)
Next by Date: Re: /run and read-only /etc
Previous by thread: Re: /run and read-only /etc
Next by thread: Re: /run and read-only /etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread