[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-10 (i386 source all)

From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
Subject: Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-10 (i386 source all)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT)

> One of the 'links' developers brought up this issue a few months ago -
> isn't 'links' GPL also?  (w3m is not, I recall).

Yes, links is GPL so we don't distribute links+openssl,
as far as I checked.

links (0.98-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Changed back to original ("Mikulas") codebase
  * SSL is still stipped due to the license problems between
    GPL and OpenSSL: it is not possible to distribute links+openssl
    neither binary nor source.

But elinks(extended links?), which is also GPL, seemed 
linked with gnutls already and supported ssl.

kohda@nsx:~$ ldd /usr/bin/elinks 
	libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4001b000)
	libgnutls.so.5 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.5 (0x400d7000)
	liblua40.so.4.0 => /usr/lib/liblua40.so.4.0 (0x40109000)
	liblualib40.so.4.0 => /usr/lib/liblualib40.so.4.0 (0x4011a000)
	libgcrypt.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.1 (0x402a9000)

I'm not sure these are what you want to know but
at least FYI.

Best regards,			2003-4-8(Tue)

 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.

Reply to: