Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-10 (i386 source all)
From: Thomas Dickey <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-10 (i386 source all)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
> One of the 'links' developers brought up this issue a few months ago -
> isn't 'links' GPL also? (w3m is not, I recall).
Yes, links is GPL so we don't distribute links+openssl,
as far as I checked.
links (0.98-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed back to original ("Mikulas") codebase
* SSL is still stipped due to the license problems between
GPL and OpenSSL: it is not possible to distribute links+openssl
neither binary nor source.
But elinks(extended links?), which is also GPL, seemed
linked with gnutls already and supported ssl.
kohda@nsx:~$ ldd /usr/bin/elinks
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4001b000)
libgnutls.so.5 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.5 (0x400d7000)
liblua40.so.4.0 => /usr/lib/liblua40.so.4.0 (0x40109000)
liblualib40.so.4.0 => /usr/lib/liblualib40.so.4.0 (0x4011a000)
libgcrypt.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.1 (0x402a9000)
I'm not sure these are what you want to know but
at least FYI.
Best regards, 2003-4-8(Tue)
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.