[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: testing/excuses - why not geda?

On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:57:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 06:57:13AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 04:11, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > So I can't see what's holding them up. Anyone?
> > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt.gz
> > For some reason, it thinks installing libgeda on hppa would break
> > geda-gschem.
> But that's wrong. Aj?

No, it's not; it just means they both have to be installed together. For
some reason geda-gschem on alpha doesn't depend on libgeda14; hppa's the
first arch alphabetically that it does.

Anyway, a hint's been added; if there aren't any further problems,
it should go in tomorrow.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpWmx92aSDr1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: