Group by functionality or family? [WAS: Bug#187245: galeon-snapshot: idiotic section change]
David B Harris <david@eelf.ddts.net> writes:
>> This is a loss people. We used to group packages in sections by their
>> functionality.
>
> Except, y'know, for the x11 section.
... and the tex section. LilyPond e.g., being a music printing
package, is in Debian's section tex. That's probably because latex is
the best supported backend, and printing music is not really `sound'
or `graphics' either.
Where would you start looking for a music printing/editing package
that has no graphics frontend: sound, graphics, editors, text, or
misc?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Reply to: