Re: [cyrille@chepelov.org: Re: valgrind status]
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[explicitly cc'ing Cyrille because I'm not sure if he's reading; shout
at me if I shouldn't have done]
> From: Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille@chepelov.org>
>
> Le Wed, Apr 02, 2003, ? 01:03:17AM +0200, Marco d'Itri a ?crit:
> > Is the current maintainer MIA?
>
> I am MIA indeed.
>
> I also have been unable to send any mail to any of the Debian lists,
> for at least since last summer; I called for help a couple of times,
> but the problem has never been diagnosed, let alone be solved.
This problem sounded familiar, so I looked through my mail archives. At
least one iteration of the problem *has* been diagnosed:
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:45:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille@chepelov.org>
Cc: listmaster@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: memory debugging and C++ (program keeps crashing)
Message-ID: <20021008154535.GA17202@riva.ucam.org>
References: <20020929031027.GA7939@aokiconsulting.com> <20020929031027.GA7939@ao
kiconsulting.com> <20020929040138.GC31063@snoopy.apana.org.au> <ouu1k85de5.fsf@a
ndlx-anamika.cisco.com> <20021001015853.GA12127@snoopy.apana.org.au> <2002100106
1229.GA16177@chepelov.org> <20021001063956.GA18209@snoopy.apana.org.au> <2002100
1064947.GA16559@chepelov.org> <20021008102915.A32660@debian.org> <20021008153739
.GA18878@chepelov.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021008153739.GA18878@chepelov.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1804
Lines: 46
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Tue, Oct 08, 2002, ? 10:29:15AM -0500, Colin Watson a ?crit:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:49:47AM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> > > (I'm CC'ing upstream. Also, I'm not sure my messages go through
> > > the -devel lists, it seems they're blocked. Signing to see if that
> > > makes spamassassin happy)
> >
> > For what it's worth, here is the log header from the debian-spam
> > archive:
>
> [snip]
>
> thanks a _lot_. I was more or less suspecting this, at one point, but this
> is the evidence I lacked.
>
> What filter, beyond spamassassin, is running on l.d.o?
I believe there are some custom filters, but I'm not a listmaster myself
so I don't know the details. I was just bored and decided to see what
was ending up in debian-spam. :-)
> > There seems to be a nasty incompatibility here with IPv6 Received: lines
> > like yours:
> >
> > Received: from [2001:7a8:1084::1] (helo=muscat.intra.chepelov.org)
> >
> > You should probably contact listmaster about this, if you haven't
> > already.
>
> Unfortunately, listmaster doesn't seem to reply (who is behind this alias?
> No, where do I look where this alias is defined? master.d.o ? murphy.d.o ?)
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization, I guess. I understand the
listmaster mailbox is nightmarishly full.
> I'm a little afraid my inquiry mail was sent to /dev/null (or was it
> debian-spam?) by the filter. Would you mind forwarding this to listmaster?
Done. Summary for listmaster - the following check appears to
erroneously block mails IPv6 Received: headers like the above:
X-Debian-Message: Impossible ip address in Received: line - one of
cyberpromo's tricks "[2001"
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
> In the mean-time, please take over this package or coordinate the take-over
> by another volunteer -- it's awkward for me, because I have only read-only
> list access. And because of the time, awkward translates to "next to
> impossible".
If the above problem is still the one causing problems, would arranging
that mail is only ever sent entirely over IPv4 suffice for now?
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: