[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should I orphan linux-wlan-ng?

Hash: SHA1

On Monday 31 March 2003 01:35 pm, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 09:08:13PM -0800, Ian Eure wrote:
> > I would like to see better documentation for apt-src/linux-wlan-ng, as
> > it was not terribly clear when I played with it last. That was quite a
> > while ago, so the situation may have improved.
> Really? I found building and installation of the linux-wlan-ng modules
> to be quite well documented. The process was documented using more than
> one method in fact!
I found it somewhat alien. However, the fact that I was backporting apt-src, 
linux-wlan-ng, and a few things they depended on to woody at the same time 
probably didn't help.

I've just tried it again, and apart from some funnies with debhelper versions, 
it went quite well. When I tried it initially, I fiddled with a number of 
things, and eventually had to do it the kernel-package way. That was with 
linux-wlan-ng 0.14.1 (or thereabouts) and apt-src 0.11 or so. It does appear 
to have improved quite a bit since then.

I do think that there's an intermediate level of user/developer that is 
already familiar with using kernel-package, and who will resist a change to 
apt-src. I think that these people could benefit from more/improved 
documentation about apt-src, how it differs from kernel-package, and what the 
rationale for changing is. I.e. hand-holding to ease the transition.
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: