Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
This one time, at band camp, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>* Jamie Wilkinson <email@example.com> [030324 09:07]:
>> - Keeping track of state files in two locations is more complex than if they
>> were in only one location.
>> Unix has had a search path for a long time now. I also don't see why a
>> program would have to use *both* locations, they only need to use one of
>> them. Programs should want to write to /var/run before /run, of course --
>> it would be considered an improper use of /run for a general system program
>> that runs after the system has been initialised to be using /run when
>> /var/run is available.
>I think /var/run and /run should be kept seperate. As /bin and /usr/bin
>are. What needs to be there, before /var is mounted, should go to /run.
>(Thus only things polluting /etc/ currently)
>The rest should go to /var/run as it should until now.
Right, that's exactly how I feel too.