Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share

[Daniel Burrows <dnb114@psu.edu>]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 04:06:10PM +0100, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> was heard to say:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:29, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Why is this a problem but not binaries under /usr/lib?
> 
> There are less of them.
> 
> Under /usr/lib:
> /usr/lib/man-db/.+
> /usr/lib/apt/methods/.+
> /usr/lib/dpkg/.*
> 
> Those are the only ones that need to be labeled.

  What are the criteria for needing to be labeled?  Mozilla, xscreensaver,
and PLT Scheme all drop executables in /usr/lib.

  Daniel

-- 
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
|                     If you wish to live wisely,                             |
|                     ignore sayings--including this one.                     |
\------- Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org --------/