Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:14:43 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030314141443.GE2224@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1047477161.8182.289.camel@thanatos>
References: <[🔎] 20030310124920.GA32489@diamond.madduck.net> <[🔎] 20030311122027.GM25301@riva.ucam.org> <[🔎] 20030311132627.GB21578@evbergen.xs4all.nl> <[🔎] 20030311205203.GB5305@piper.madduck.net> <[🔎] b4lq2r$clk$1@news.cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20030312083227.GA23126@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 1047477161.8182.289.camel@thanatos>

On Mar 12, Thomas Hood <jdthood0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

 >I suggest that only those systems that need /run get /run.
 >And only those systems that need /run to be on a ramdisk get
 >/run on a ramdisk.  This will minimize the number of systems
 >that are affected.
I agree.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood0@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
Next by Date: Re: libtool crap [Re: SDL c102 transition]
Previous by thread: Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
Next by thread: Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread