[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The current (not existing) PAM policy

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:00:36PM -0800, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> Well, if that's not legal (though it's certainly worked fine thusfar)
> then it is awkward. Because I want to delete those files to force
> fallback to "other".

Deletion of conffiles is preserved.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Reply to: