Re: The current (not existing) PAM policy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:00:36PM -0800, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> Well, if that's not legal (though it's certainly worked fine thusfar)
> then it is awkward. Because I want to delete those files to force
> fallback to "other".
Deletion of conffiles is preserved.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''