Re: mail to email@example.com
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: mail to email@example.com
- From: Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:06:49 +0100
- Message-id: <20030308100649.GC12857@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
- In-reply-to: <1047063445.1288.20.camel@space-ghost>
- References: <20030222132323.GB16914@azure.humbug.org.au> <1045938842.2380.11.camel@space-ghost> <20030222193431.GB23369@riva.ucam.org> <1045944746.2998.9.camel@space-ghost> <20030222222704.GA31296@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <1045956294.10724.4.camel@space-ghost> <1047063445.1288.20.camel@space-ghost>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:57:25PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > > Why doesn't debian-bugs-dist see -quiet messages?
> > >
> > > Because that is the whole point of -quiet messages, to avoid bothering
> > > anyone with them?
> > Hm. Ok. How about then we create another target -log or -discuss or
> > something, which doesn't CC anyone?
> Any email@example.com people care to comment on this proposal? Should I
> try to make a patch?
Er, but -quiet already does that. You'd want to create one that e.g. reaches
the maintainer, the submitter, debian-bugs-dist and the bug log
2. That which causes joy or happiness.