Re: "testing" improvements
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:46:54PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> En r?ponse ? Michael Banck <email@example.com>:
> > When we said we'd had to wait how testing behaves after the first
> > release, nobody expected the span^Wglibc thingy. So perhaps we'll have
> > to wait one more time to see how britney really performs in the wild.
> Do we require all the time the latest version of glibc?
I do have to ask myself why so many people are more concerned with
juggling infrastructure details rather than, well, fixing the bugs.
Testing is doing a pretty good job of keeping the bugs out; if that
encounters problems due to the base system being perpetually buggy, then
*that* is the problem we should be fixing, not shooting the messenger.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]