Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030215005030.GP19446@rilke>, Cardenas <mbc@debian.org> writes:
> In my opinion, the actual behavior here (very different from the
> speculation on this issue farther down the thread) does not warrant
> removal from the archive.
Really? I have read the code aj posted (and I trust aj); I do
not see how that code jibes with your assertion above. Can you please
show why that code snippet differs from the so called speculation?
manoj
--
Calm down, it's only ones and zeroes, Calm down, it's only bits and
bytes, Calm down, and speak to me in English, Please realize that I'm
not one of your computerites.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: