[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package



On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:57:35 PST, Cardenas writes:
>Are you guys nuts? Upstream just wants their software to run
>optimally, and the maintainer refuses to do so. What's wrong with
>upstream informing users of the situation?

nothing is wrong with upstream not being happy with the maintainer.
*everything* is wrong with a sneaky action like this.

>All we're doing is turning away a
>perfectly capable developer for a few printf's?

technical capability and responsibility are orthogonal.

rüdiger is gone from the queue now, so i'd say EOD.

regards
az

-- 
+ Alexander Zangerl + az@snafu.priv.at + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
Behind every great computer sits a skinny little geek.

Attachment: pgpZW55R8Xn03.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: