Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030213180003.GA781@donald.duckburg.org>, Davide Puricelli <evo@debian.org> writes:
> I don't think we should remove micq and I'll try to explain my
> idea: Rüdiger Kuhlmann, upstream author of micq, with this "anti
> debian easter egg" showed to the world that there are some big
> problems between him and the Debian maintainer of micq, so we
> should analyze these issues;
I see. You have the same response to other crackers, too?
Some guy reformats my hard drive, he must have issues with
me, let us examine his feelings.
manoj
--
A good awakening have ever Gotama's disciples, whose recollection is
always established, day and night on the Buddha. 296
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: