Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:20:23AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:16:25AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >I don't see any need to rush to catch up with Red Hat.
> Why do people labor under the assumption that red hat has anything to do
> with a feeling that our release numbering is silly?
Actually, what I really meant was that I don't see that we need to
release something with a new major version once a year, for example. So
if our next release is a year away but isn't really that significant, we
shouldn't feel compelled to increment our major version number.
So far the C++ transition doesn't seem significant enough to me. The new
installer might be, but OTOH installation is once and operation is
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>