Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:04:36AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > 1.1 was a major release due to ELF (NB: would have been 1.0)
> > 1.2 was not as the distribution only grew and changed
> > 1.3 likewise
> > 2.0 was a major release due to glibc
> > 2.1 was not as the distribution only grew and changed
> > 2.2 likewise
> > 3.0 was a major release due to an arbitrary decision of the release
> > manager, but that's the first time that happened. I hope you're not trying
> > to perpetuate that.
> So 4.0 will be a major release because of GCC 3.2 and C++ recompilation along
> with KDE 3.1 and kernel 2.6?
Hopefully a new installer as well, to make sure. :)
2. That which causes joy or happiness.