On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:28:08AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > This definatly needs to be figured out. > > If we are supposed to follow the c++ transition plan then we should > follow it. > > Are we? Are we not? Isn't the removal of gcc-3.0 a separate issue from the C++ transition? Does the package not build with 3.2? -- - mdz