Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?

To: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists@andrew.net.au>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:05:52 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030202230552.GF22165@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mail-followup-to: Brian May <bam@debian.org>, Andrew Pollock <debian-lists@andrew.net.au>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030202205042.GA31938@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
References: <[🔎] 20030202205042.GA31938@daedalus.andrew.net.au>

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:50:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Can anyone provide me with mailing list archive URLs from when this change
> would have been discussed publically?

I assume it was deliberate? Or was it unintentional?
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?
  - From: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists@andrew.net.au>

References:
- Recent glibc time_t redefinition?
  - From: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists@andrew.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Please don't non-bugs in changelog (again)
Next by Date: Re: Default menu entries are deprecated, 2nd call.
Previous by thread: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?
Next by thread: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread