Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes: >> Oooops... >> link against qt-mt (thread-support), and not qt, solved that very nicely > > Could anyone clue me in as to why there are qt libraries without > mt and qt-mt ? > > I seem to be experiencing some kind of mix-and-matching (I tried > to compile ecawave with libqt3 and it gave me warnings that some plugins > were compiled with thread support and ecawave wasn't, and I > tried linking with libqt3-mt, and the warning was gone.) I was wondering about this too. It seems that long ago, it was not preferable to link against the mt version, but I doubt that's the case now. Ivan, any clues? -- My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy. It's over here in a jar. Would you like to see it?
Attachment:
pgpmPnK7oBNmj.pgp
Description: PGP signature