[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?



On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 17:02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:44:17PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> 
> > Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com> writes:
> > > > Can you tell it to not use/produce shared libraries at all (e.g., just
> > > > use traditional static libraries)?
> > >
> > > If you're using libtool from within automake:
> > > 
> > > lib_LTLIBRARIES = libhello.la
> > > libhello_la_LDFLAGS = -static
> > 
> > Actually I think the problem was that the package I had problems with
> > had been distributed with a very old version of libtool; after updating
> > to something more recent, I can use the --disable-shared and --enable-static
> > configure switches to get what I want.
> 
> Speaking of which...is there any way to force building only a shared
> library, without using --disable-static?  flac, for example, builds both a
> normal shared library (shared and static versions) and a plugin (which makes
> no sense static, and would be a pain to link statically).  Currently, it
> uses separate libtools to build the two libraries, which seems silly.
> 
In your configure.in put

AC_DISABLE_STATIC

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant     Have you ever, ever felt like this?  Had strange
http://netsplit.com/      things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: