On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 17:02, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:44:17PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > > > Scott James Remnant <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > > > > Can you tell it to not use/produce shared libraries at all (e.g., just > > > > use traditional static libraries)? > > > > > > If you're using libtool from within automake: > > > > > > lib_LTLIBRARIES = libhello.la > > > libhello_la_LDFLAGS = -static > > > > Actually I think the problem was that the package I had problems with > > had been distributed with a very old version of libtool; after updating > > to something more recent, I can use the --disable-shared and --enable-static > > configure switches to get what I want. > > Speaking of which...is there any way to force building only a shared > library, without using --disable-static? flac, for example, builds both a > normal shared library (shared and static versions) and a plugin (which makes > no sense static, and would be a pain to link statically). Currently, it > uses separate libtools to build the two libraries, which seems silly. > In your configure.in put AC_DISABLE_STATIC Scott -- Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part