Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:02:17PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Speaking of which...is there any way to force building only a
> > shared library, without using --disable-static? flac, for
> > example, builds both a normal shared library (shared and static
> > versions) and a plugin (which makes no sense static, and would be
> > a pain to link statically). Currently, it uses separate libtools
> > to build the two libraries, which seems silly.
> I had a feeling, at one time, based on mailing list discussions or
> something, that libtool has a special mode for plugins.
> Does the '-module' command line parameter help?
No, static versions are built nevertheless.
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | email@example.com
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62