On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Adam Heath] > > Why couldn't you have modified the packages(what were they) to support > > debconf, and send the modifications back to the maintainers? > > I did. Some were accepted, some were ignored, and some were refused > because debconf is not a required feature. Ignored is understandable. We are all volunteers. Which were refused? 'required feature' is not reason enough.