Re: Make debconf mandatory for prompting the user
[Adam Heath]
> Ignored is understandable. We are all volunteers.
>
> Which were refused? 'required feature' is not reason enough.
I checked my bug reports and the bug database for Skolelinux. Here is
a summary of the ten packages we needed to convert to debconf. We
dropped postgresql, php4-pgsql, vold and gpm, and make our own patched
php4 packages.
Solved in time for Woody
------------------------
pcmcia-cd - no patch from me, solved by the maintainer
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127899
samba - no patch from me, solved by the maintainer
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127959
webalizer - patch accepted
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127904
Solved in Sid/Testing, unsolved in Woody
----------------------------------------
postgresql - no patch from me, solved in sid, unsolved in woody
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127960
ispell-dicts - no patch from me, solved in sid, unsolved in woody
(fixed to accept DEBIAN_FRONOTEND=noninteractive instead).
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=123641
Unsolved
--------
exim 3 - asked to use exim 4 instead
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=86210
php4 - patch ignored / not required by policy
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=122353
php4-pgsql - patch ignored
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127961
vold - no patch from me, bug report ignored
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128014
gpm - no patch from me, bug report ignored
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129070
Reply to: