Re: gcc 3.2 transition clarification
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 08, Stephen Frost <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >File wishlist bugs against those packages which don't support prelinking
> >yet and perhaps the maintainers will update them. A bulk rebuild is a
> Is this agreed by everybody? It's a *long* list.
A bulk rebuild would require increments to every package's version
number, ie a source change, ie hassles for every affected developer.
Does this prelinking justify that?
(Actually I have no idea what prelinking is. That package Marco
mentioned hasn't hit my mirror yet.)
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>