Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable
Graham Wilson <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:03:26PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> cu andreas, wondering why people only start commenting on
>> the transition plan the day it is executed and not the
>> (many) months it was for public review. (I am no DD.)
> where was the transition plan announced. i dont remember hearing about
> it (though i probably missed it)?
> i just looked through the debian-devel-announce archives starting in Jul
> 2002 and didnt anything there, either.
It was not announced on debian-devel-announce, but there were (iirc at
least 5 bigger) discussion threads  on debian-devel, the first one
quite long ago in August:
feasturing the first proposal of the transition-plan. This one did not
differ much from the final one, /s/c/c102/, no mention of qt2 and most
of the fine reasoning in the final one was missing.
 Subject usually "Status of gcc 3.2 transition".
Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette!
Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_