Re: gcc 3.2 is now the default compiler in unstable
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:48:12PM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> >Can anything be said about when the whole thing will hit sarge?
>
> I can say that I expect this to take atleast 6 months, probably more.
>
> Unless there is divine intervention, you won't even see parts of it
> before that.
Why do you say this? This isn't like libc5->libc6; there are a much smaller
number of packages affected.
--
- mdz
Reply to: