On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 01:12:27PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The first part of this has been done for priorities & conflicts a few
> > times, and the second and third parts generally haven't.
> With the third parts do you mean the `keep this information up to date'
> where `this information' means what is currently broken and needs to
> be fixed?
No, I mean people actually working on fixing them.
> Because if so feel free to look at daily generated lists such as
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php, which is the successor of
> http://master.debian.org/~wakkerma/unmet-woody.html which was created
> over 3 years ago. Or just run `apt-cache unmet' and get your own
> list of broken package relations.
Yes, there's also
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~sanvila/dependency-checks/
and
http://ftp-master.debian.org/unmet-sid.html
too.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgp9wyQ_Fpxuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature