[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#174308: star should become standard tar



On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:34:48PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 07:01:21PM +1100, bug1@optushome.com.au wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 02:03:20 +0100
> > Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> wrote:

> > > Not till it begins to emulate GNU tar's default behaviour.

> > GNU tar should not be seen as the the standard, POSIX should be.

> If a standards document goes off into the wild blue yonder and defines
> a "standard" that is incompatible with existing practice, then I don't
> see why we would have any reason to follow it.

> Also, Debian has always taken advantage of the rich set of features
> offered by the GNU tools.  I see no benefit to limiting ourselves to
> the use of POSIX features.  I certainly see no a priori reason to
> adopt it as the standard to write to.  POSIX itself is non-free, and
> many of its standardization choices are motivated by compromises for
> the sake of proprietary unix systems.  I think such systems should be
> supplanted, not catered to.

So when is ACL-support for gtar going to be available?  I'm a little
miffed to learn that there are other free tar implementations out there
that handle ACLs, while Debian and GNU tar are lagging behind.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpSIjKd4PyEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: