Re: Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)

To: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 10:49:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021226094937.GD29656@dat.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021226093038.GA27461@dat.etsit.upm.es>
References: <[🔎] 20021224232809.GA9374@uk.intasys.com> <[🔎] 20021226093038.GA27461@dat.etsit.upm.es>

(..)
> Dpkg for example, does not store permissions (see bug #34194) and that
> could be very useful for system checks (and recover).

I failed to mention Bug #166937 which is also relevant (but assigned to
'general' instead of dpkg...)

	Regards

	Javi

Attachment: pgpLaMZ_A5zCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Security notification script in Perl
  - From: Steve Kemp <debian-devel@steve.org.uk>
- Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>

Prev by Date: Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)
Next by Date: Bug#174308: star should become standard tar
Previous by thread: Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)
Next by thread: Re: Common (basic) security checks for a base installation? (was Re: Security notification script in Perl)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread