Re: replace lynx with (e)links in base
Interesting how links and links-ssl have different changelogs (despite
theoretically being from the same package). Check out bug #165275, btw.
I've been playing w/ a self-compiled links2 for a few months now; the
features are quite nice, and definitely puts it ahead of elinks or the
older links. Unfortunately, the javascript engine is broken/incomplete..
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:48:35 +0000, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:24:08AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:02:38PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> > > > Take elinks as an example; it's faster, more compact and offers
>> > elinks = links/links-ssl in Debisn
>>
>> Really?
>
> I was thinking "links" is "elinks" because sometimes the word "elinks" is
> displaed when "links" is run from some version of "links". Hmm ....
> ----------------------------------------------------------- links-ssl
> (0.98-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * back to links (of Mikulas Patocka fame) upstream.
> Check your config files, you probably need reconfiguring.
> * elinks is now split into a separate package, which has
> far more features, but considered less stable. YOU ARE ADVISED TO
> CHANGE TO ELINKS. (*hint* *hint*)
>
> -- Peter Gervai <grin@tolna.net> Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:15:36 +0200
>
> links-ssl (0.96.20020607-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream release (v0.4pre7)
> ----------------------------------------------------------- I think I have
> to change ....
Reply to: