Re: replace lynx with (e)links in base
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:24:08AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:02:38PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > Take elinks as an example; it's faster, more compact and offers
> > elinks = links/links-ssl in Debisn
>
> Really?
I was thinking "links" is "elinks" because sometimes the word "elinks"
is displaed when "links" is run from some version of "links".
Hmm ....
-----------------------------------------------------------
links-ssl (0.98-1) unstable; urgency=low
* back to links (of Mikulas Patocka fame) upstream.
Check your config files, you probably need reconfiguring.
* elinks is now split into a separate package, which has
far more features, but considered less stable.
YOU ARE ADVISED TO CHANGE TO ELINKS. (*hint* *hint*)
-- Peter Gervai <grin@tolna.net> Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:15:36 +0200
links-ssl (0.96.20020607-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (v0.4pre7)
-----------------------------------------------------------
I think I have to change ....
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: