Re: Eclipse

To: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Cc: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>, David Nusinow <david.nusinow@verizon.net>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Eclipse
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:17:35 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87of7julnk.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021218004303.GA31462@snoopy.apana.org.au> (Brian May's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:43:03 +1100")
References: <[🔎] 200212161924.10887.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20021216183657.GA9669@ProteinBoy> <[🔎] 87wum9m53s.fsf@debian.org> <[🔎] 20021218004303.GA31462@snoopy.apana.org.au>

>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <bam@debian.org> writes:
    Brian> Is it DFSG compliant?

Eclipse itself is DFSG compliant.  However, it depends on Java2,
forcing it into contrib (for now at least) & making it unbuildable on
most architectures.

-- 
Stephen

"So if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."... "And
therefore?"... "A witch!"

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eclipse
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>

References:
- Eclipse
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: Eclipse
  - From: David Nusinow <david.nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: Eclipse
  - From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
- Re: Eclipse
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Announcing apt-watch: a Gnome 2 panel applet to check for upgrades
Next by Date: Re: Linux World NY 2003
Previous by thread: Re: Eclipse
Next by thread: Re: Eclipse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread