Re: 3.2 transition
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> There still seem to be a lot of kernel people who don't trust 3.2; now
> whether that is a kernel issue or a gcc issue is very difficult to tell
> - my personal guess is that it is a bit of both. Definitly 2.95.x is
> still the recommended kernel compiler for most architectures - a pity
> given the improvements 3.2.x has made in many places.
This is usually due to the kernel being written to the compilers bugs,
or has been in the past.