On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 14:17, David B Harris wrote: > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 15:04:55 -0500 > David B Harris <david@eelf.ddts.net> wrote: > > > > And forget the ico format altogether. > > Having more than one image in a single file, for the purposes of > favicon.ico, is not a stupid idea. So if you really want to do things > well, you're still stuck using Windows icon resource files. > > And who cares? It's a bloody file format, and it's well-understood. The real problem with favicon.ico is that it's a broken way to handle bookmark icons. Using <link> is more flexible, and defines a real semantic relationship between the document and the icon. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part