[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[jules@debian.org: Re: Intent to NMU Balsa 2.0.3]



Hi everyone,
	Just notifying the list beforehand so that no one goes ape
when I do make a RFS for a NMU = P

Yours sincerely,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

----- Forwarded message from Jules Bean <jules@debian.org> -----

From: Jules Bean <jules@debian.org>
To: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@debianplanet.org>
Subject: Re: Intent to NMU Balsa 2.0.3
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0
	tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.43
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:27:08AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Dear Jules,
> 	I'm writing to ask if you have anything against me packaging
> Balsa 2 for Debian or even NMUing the 1.x branch to bring it up in
> line with 1.4.1 from 1.2.4? I'd more than willing to act only as a
> NMU-only maintainer Balsa's until you have time to resume your
> debian-devel duties again.

Don't bother with the 1.4 branch.  Go for 2.0.

I did a preliminary package of 2.0 here, there weren't any problems
that I recall.

Don't make the mistake the recent NMU'er made: be sure to include more
recent config.guess and config.sub files, so the package compiles on
'unusual' arches (e.g. mips).

Keep me posted, but feel free to NMU if you like.

What would be even cooler is to have a trawl with balsa's bug list ;)
Only people with copious 'spare' time need apply!

Jules


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau    Computer Science & Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it		      Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
*     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpuH4w9WA4_K.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: