[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: guaranteed non-interactive installation and upgrades

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > i think it's a little heavy handed to do so,
> Why?

well, i should restate i guess.  i agree it's the best thing to do.
but i would also image that it suddenly puts a lot more work on the
plates of many of the dd's, hence my thinking that suddenly adding this
rule and the resulting flood of lintian/bug reports would be a little heavy

then again, the wishlist bug for exim to use debconf is almost two years
old... so maybe just politely asking won't get it done :) 


Attachment: pgpgalmIOunz4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: