On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:41:29 EST, Joey Hess writes: >q-agent is a PITA to get working with stuff like mutt though, so I do >look forward to using gpg-agent. <ad type=self> What for? signing/encrypting stuff? if so, maybe have a look at kuvert. </ad> >I just think I'd guard my laptop with >my mail signing key on it about the same no matter which agent I had >running. of course. as soon as you cache with anything you'll have to be as careful as possible. the point in favour of q-agent, gpg-agent and similar: if used right, that's the one and only place passwords/phrases are lingering. (that's why fetchmail on my box mustn't cache, exmh has to use q-agent etc. pp) regards az -- + Alexander Zangerl + az@snafu.priv.at + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291) Hit any user to continue.
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature