Re: New maintainer process

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New maintainer process
From: Mateusz Papiernik <mati@mati.rm.pl>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:39:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021122163925.747f1937.mati@mati.rm.pl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87d6oxtyqj.fsf@goliathbbs.dnsalias.net>
References: <[🔎] 20021122115213.GA6606@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <[🔎] 20021122130429.GC17334@darkness.linuxasylum.net> <[🔎] 20021122132458.GF26824@blackbird.oase.mhn.de> <[🔎] 873cptbtuw.fsf@goliathbbs.dnsalias.net> <[🔎] 20021122145825.0904c11a.mati@mati.rm.pl> <[🔎] 87d6oxtyqj.fsf@goliathbbs.dnsalias.net>

> The AM, FrontDesk and everyone that reads debian-newmaint. :)
> DAM stage is (more or less) easy to recover.
Thank God ;P



-- 
Mati (mati@mati.rm.pl)
Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support

Reply to:

References:
- New maintainer process
  - From: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists@andrew.net.au>
- Re: New maintainer process
  - From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@linuxasylum.net>
- Re: New maintainer process
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
- Re: New maintainer process
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: New maintainer process
  - From: Mateusz Papiernik <mati@mati.rm.pl>
- Re: New maintainer process
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: New maintainer process
Next by Date: Re: Possible mass filing of bugs: don't use libxaw-dev
Previous by thread: Re: New maintainer process
Next by thread: Re: New maintainer process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread