[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?

>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:

 Steve> Then perhaps it would help if there were some commonly
 Steve> agreed-upon, objective criteria used to determine when a
 Steve> package is ready for unstable as opposed to experimental?
 Steve> (Projected number of RC bugs, optimal duration of transition
 Steve> period, size of userbase...)  This could at least help users
 Steve> know what they're getting -- both in terms of how broken
 Steve> unstable might be, and how out-of-date testing might be.

	This is very hard, if not impossible, to determine a
 priori. Unless someone hands me a crystall ball ;-)

 Kent's Heuristic: Look for it first where you'd most like to find it.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: