Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
On 19-Nov-02, 19:20 (CST), Michael Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:18:56PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >The whole point of the unstable->testing->stable system to get a stable,
> >tested, consistent, releasable OS. A subgoal is to keep RC bugs out of
> >testing. How do get that if the packages don't actually *use* unstable?
> By having developers test & use unstable.
Which is it? Do you want me to build and use unstable packages, or do
you want me to use libraries from testing?
> I can make a similar assertion of the sort "how do we get testing
> tested if the packages don't actually *use* testing?"
Does not compute. The packages in testing *do* use testing. They all
came from unstable.
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net