On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:33:35PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > You are copying it and modifying it. That is a fork. It is better that you > are synching it, but it seems better to have a single authoritative source. I am not modifying it (unless you count reformatting as such). The content is out of sync, just that. And the way I'm providing this for offline use is from *within* the document. For goodness sake! I'm not going to make a new document in the DDP with just a few pages. It makes much more sense for the FAQ to be a section of the *only* document that covers security in Debian. If you don't like that go write a new one for the DDP, maybe "Security in Debian"?. Feel free to fork mine BTW. Agreed, harden-doc might not be the best name for a package that contains the Security reference for Debian. I'm not the maintainer, bug *him*. [1] Are Josip and I the only DDs to whom it makes sense to provide the "Security Team's FAQ" in the "Securing Debian Manual"? (which, BTW, is also linked at security.debian.org) Regards Javi [1] For the sake of the harden-doc maintainer I'll say that the Manual started as a Hardening-HOWTO for Debian, it now includes much more information of which hardening a Debian system is just a chapter. There's still a lot of things to include but it's moving that way.
Attachment:
pgpExsT_BtR39.pgp
Description: PGP signature