Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:49:21 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021115234921.GN32498@apocalypse.deadbeast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021115085021.GC9063@dat.etsit.upm.es>
References: <[🔎] 1037271478.29863.16.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20021115085021.GC9063@dat.etsit.upm.es>

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Sorry I apologize for my rudeness. I'm ticked off due to the fact that I
> wanted us to advance forward and this discussion is mainly going round and
> round and round and round .....

Look on the bright side; you could be participating in the non-free
removal General Resolution thread.

(As far as I can tell, you're not really, though you did contribute to a
couple of off-topic threadlets.)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |       The software said it required
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       Windows 3.1 or better, so I
branden@debian.org                 |       installed Linux.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpQ0I77Iqi9q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal - non-free software removal
Next by Date: Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
Previous by thread: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by thread: no more non-free additions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread